Monarchy Forum
Sign up Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment  
royalcello

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 6,825
Reply with quote  #1 

Return to the Article

       

The Disconnect Between Hawaii & America

By Peter Brown

Hilo. Hawaii - Americans who visit Hawaii often feel they are in a foreign country, and if those tourists cared about the island's politics that might make them even more likely to wonder if they really are in the United States.

Three recent developments raise the question of whether the people and politicians in the nation's 50th state have much in common with the traditions and Constitution of the nation of which they are part.

-- The state's political establishment is backing a school that wants to continue openly discriminating on the basis of race in its admissions practices.

-- Hawaii's government has, until rebuked by a federal court, banned the hiring of Americans who are not Hawaii residents from state jobs.

-- Because Congress refused efforts to create self-rule for native Hawaiians, there is a growing movement to set up a native Hawaiian government that would seek billions of dollars in state assets.

Hawaii's demographics - more than two-thirds of residents are of Asian descent -- lead to the cultural differences with the mainland. Its physical isolation exacerbates a sense of Hawaii exceptionalism.

This mentality is best exemplified by the manager of one Marriott hotel, who explained the chain's properties on the islands operate under polices that govern its Asian, not U.S., facilities.

Nothing illustrates the island's political mind-set better than a long-running school admissions case that would likely be laughed out of court elsewhere in America. The arguments made for it - and even embraced by the state's first Republican governor in 40 years - sound eerily familiar to those of 1960s southern segregationists.

For 118 years, the Kamehameha Schools have limited enrollment to those with native-Hawaiian blood. Its highly regarded K-12 schools are funded by an almost $7 billion trust left by 19th century Princess Bernice Pauahi Bishop.

Supporters claim that because no tax money is involved discrimination is permissible, although federal courts decades long ago dismissed that same argument in Dixie by segregation academies.

Enrollment is offered to all "qualified" native-Hawaiians. If spaces there left over, members of other races may be considered. But only a handful of the 5,400 students on the school's three campuses are not of native Hawaiian descent.

. School officials say a history of unfair treatment of native Hawaiians justifies the policy. The Supreme Court has allowed racial preferences to compensate for past discrimination in limited cases.

A three-judge panel of the Ninth U.S. Court of Appeals last August said the schools' policy does not meet that criterion. The decision triggered a massive protest demonstration by native Hawaiians.

The full 15-judge Ninth Circuit in June heard an appeal. Regardless of the verdict, the case seems destined for the U.S. Supreme Court.

In another legal matter, a U.S. District judge last month threw out a state prohibition on non-Hawaiian residents applying for state jobs. That rule, if approved by the courts, could have reshaped the relationships between states that have existed for more than two centuries.

Nevertheless, Hawaii Attorney General Mark Bennett will appeal to sustain the law, which was enacted to discourage immigrants, but would seem based on a belief this state is a separate entity, rather than one of 50.

Then there is the drive to create a separate government for the about 20 percent of the state's population who have native-Hawaiian blood. Some believe they deserve special treatment because their monarchy was overthrown more than a century ago in a conspiracy engineered by sugar barons and aided by the U.S. government.

Since Congress refused to give native Hawaiians that status earlier this year, a movement with substantial political clout has surfaced to have a referendum create a separate nation for native Hawaiians.

The goal is an entity that would be unique in the United States to represent native Hawaiians that could negotiate with a friendly state government for billions of dollars in assets.

In this unusual political incubator it can't be dismissed as it would be elsewhere in the USA.

Peter A. Brown is assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute. He can be reached at peter.brown@quinnipiac.edu
Page Printed from: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2006/07/the_disconnect_between_hawaii.html at July 05, 2006 - 06:12:30 PM CDT
royalcello

Avatar / Picture

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 6,825
Reply with quote  #2 
Of course there's a "disconnect."  Hawaii is the only American state that was once a fully sovereign and internationally recognized kingdom.   The US had no business annexing Hawaii in the first place.   I hope that someday royalist Hawaiian nationalists succeed in restoring their country's sovereignty and monarchy.
WhiteCockade

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 316
Reply with quote  #3 

Something about forcing a nation's monarch to sign over sovereignty at gun point can cause a disconnect...I would think.


__________________
"By me kings reign... and the mighty decree justice" - Proverbs 8:15-16
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Catholicmonarchists/
BaronVonServers

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 11,993
Reply with quote  #4 
Like Parliament did to Charles I with a executrioners Blade?
Like the pertulent 13 did to HM King George III?
Like Napoleon did to Charles IV?

Not many Monarchs gave up the throne with out the threat of the blade, or gun.



__________________
"In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas"

I am NOT an authorized representative of my Government.

Learn more about the Dominion of British West Florida at http://dbwf.net
BaronVonServers

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 11,993
Reply with quote  #5 
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalcello
Of course there's a "disconnect."  Hawaii is the only American state that was once a fully sovereign and internationally recognized kingdom.   The US had no business annexing Hawaii in the first place.   I hope that someday royalist Hawaiian nationalists succeed in restoring their country's sovereignty and monarchy.


Only Kingdom, yes, but not the only Sovereign and Internationally recognized State, the United States had a habit in the 18th and 19th centuries of 'occupy & annex'.

Most of the Tribal Nations in North America had treaties with Foreign Kings, including those of the United Kingdom, France, and Spain.  Didn't slow the Americans down one bit, they respected those treaties no more than they did their own. 

The Choctaw, the Cherokee, the Creek, the Appalachie all had treaties with the United Kingdom of Great Britain.  The Choctaw and Creek also had treaties with the Kingdom of France.  Once the Republic won the war of rebellion, it didn't mean spit.  The loss of the British Crown in most of  North America was a disaster for the Indians.

__________________
"In necessariis unitas, in dubiis libertas, in omnibus caritas"

I am NOT an authorized representative of my Government.

Learn more about the Dominion of British West Florida at http://dbwf.net
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.