Monarchy Forum
Sign up Latest Topics
 
 
 


Reply
  Author   Comment   Page 4 of 4      Prev   1   2   3   4
azadi

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 1,474
Reply with quote  #46 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wessexman
Inevitable is too strong. Hardly anything is inevitable, especially in human affairs. However, I do fear it likely enough that the monarchy in Australia will be endangered in the foreseeable future.

I'm not opposed to Australia and Canada remaining Commonwealth realms, because of their historical and cultural ties to Britain, but monarchies can't survive, if they aren't tied to nationalism. That's why republicanism is strong in Australia and in Canada, while republicanism is weak in Britain. 
Peter

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 7,442
Reply with quote  #47 
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex yesterday attended their last scheduled royal engagement. The report here covers that and also their various other activities over the last few days. And here is a surprisingly sympathetic view from the Independent, a republican newspaper as we all know. It is very much my hope that Their Royal Highnesses (which they will not cease to be, only to be known as) will at some time in the future decide to return to Britain and to full-time royal life, where they will both be missed.
Ethiomonarchist

Avatar / Picture

Registered:
Posts: 5,334
Reply with quote  #48 
And then this rather embarrassing thing happened....

Nothing terribly scandalous was said, but it illustrates the increased risks the Duke and Duchess will face away from the royal family.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8099967/Full-transcript-Prince-Harrys-bizarre-call-Russians-pretending-Greta-Thunberg.html

__________________
The Lion of Judah hath prevailed.

Ethiopia stretches her hands unto God (Quote from Psalm 68 which served as the Imperial Motto of the Ethiopian Empire)

"God and history shall remember your judgment." (Quote from Emperor Haile Selassie I's speech to the League of Nations to plead for assistance against the Italian Invasion, 1936.)
Peter

Moderator
Registered:
Posts: 7,442
Reply with quote  #49 
Today, 31st March, is the last day, for now, that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex will be using their royal titles. They are widely reported to be residing in Malibu, California (and thus rubbing shoulders with Bob Dylan, if anyone rubbed shoulders with anyone else these days), having left Canada with their infant son just before the border closed. The reason for the move has been variously cited as avoiding double taxation and proximity to the Duchess's widely-admired mother. Her not at all admired father has been quoted as saying they should instead have headed back to Britain to support the Queen. His fee for the quote has not been revealed.

Plans are that in a year's time the situation will be reviewed, with a possible return to royal life. While I would certainly like to see that I also hope that their ambitions for a successful life as a couple and reduced exposure to the media glare for themselves and their child will be realised. In the meantime there is the question of what to call Their Royal Highnesses from tomorrow. Their Graces would seem obvious but has not been mentioned even once that I have seen. Harry and Meghan will doubtless be their preference. I think I'll stick to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, wordy perhaps but both accurate and respectful.
Previous Topic | Next Topic
Print
Reply

Quick Navigation:

Easily create a Forum Website with Website Toolbox.