Originally Posted by Murtagon
Yes, Azadi, it seems we agree on something completely.

I don't know about the other members you have listed, but I'm pretty sure that ContraTerrentumQR is practically no longer a member, because of some rather major disagreements about the French succession. That's what I remember from my lurking and reading old posts in even older threads, in the days when Royalcello himself actually visited.

Originally Posted by azadi

Discussing the French succession with ContraTerrentum would have been very exciting, because he is a staunch Legitimist, while I'm a Bonapartist. I admire Napoleon, and I consider him the greatest hero of France ever. But as a Russophile, I'm opposed to his invasion of Russia. I dislike French Legitimism, because it rejects the legacy of the French Revolution entirely. I support the legacy of the French Revolution of 1789, while rejecting the legacy of the French Revolution of 1792.
Emperor's Advocate is a staunch Habsburg loyalist, who wants the Habsburgs to be restored to the thrones of not only Austria and Hungary, but also Spain and most of Italy.
Domhangairt is a South African of Scottish descent, who supports Scottish independence. Domhangairt is an anti-Semite, and he criticizes a lot of European royal dynasties for being of foreign origin. I'm strongly opposed to anti-Semitism and other forms of racism, and I believe in the Old Covenant remaining valid after the resurrection of Jesus. I'm not opposed to royal dynasties being of foreign origin, if they adopt the culture of their subjects. I want a foreign prince, who marries a Kurdish woman and learns the Kurdish language, to be elected Shah of Kurdistan.
DavidV is an Australian of Czech descent, who is an Anglophile, and who hates Putin, the People's Republic of China, Assad, the Islamic Republic of Iran and the ANC (the ruling party of South Africa). I admire Putin and the ANC, and I consider Assad the least bad option for Syria, but I despise the Islamic republic of Iran, and I'm not terribly fond of the People's Republic of China.
 

Originally Posted by azadi

As a Germanophile, because you have proposed returning North Schleswig to Germany, despite being a Dane, and as an Anglophile, because you have proposed Great Britain annexing the entire Antarctica. 

Originally Posted by azadi

As a Germanophile, because you have proposed returning North Schleswig to Germany, despite being a Dane, and as an Anglophile, because you have proposed Great Britain annexing the entire Antarctica. 

Originally Posted by bator


thank you but i really have to correct some misuderstandings then: i didnt propose returning north schleswig to germany, i said i would be willing to loose it, it it meant the restoration of the monarchy in germany. i would of course prefer to have all of schleswig back to denmark as it was originally.

yes i proposed that uk should annex all of antarctica, but that doesnt mean im an anglophile. the fact is that the british queen was the first to take a royal title as monarch of a part of antarctica. if instead another monarch had started by taking the title as monarch of a part of antarctica, i would have liked all of antarctica to be united under that monarch instead, regardless of the nationality of the monarch. i hope you see the difference? :-)